Operations leadership reviewing performance metrics across sites

FOR EXECUTIVES

CMMS Software for Executives

Maintenance is a cost line until it can prove otherwise.

Downtime, cost per asset, and capital exposure in numbers you can take to a board, produced by the work rather than assembled for the meeting.

  • Multi-site rollup
  • Evidence behind the number
  • Capital case from real history
McDonald'sCaterpillarPepsiChevronUnileverYamahaShellStratasys

Trusted by 4,000+ industrial teams

WHAT CHANGES

Why maintenance numbers rarely survive scrutiny

The problem is usually not the performance. It is that nobody can show where the figure came from. Four things change that.

The downtime number is an estimate somebody assembled for the meeting.

Downtime is recorded against the asset as it happens, so the figure has a record behind it and survives the follow-up question.

You can see total maintenance spend but not what any site, line, or asset costs.

Labor, parts, and vendor spend roll up by asset, site, and region, which is what makes a trade-off decision possible.

Capital requests arrive as a number with a story attached.

Condition and repair history accumulate from the work, producing a defensible replace-or-repair case per asset.

Each site reports differently, so nothing is comparable.

One system, one set of definitions, and the same measures everywhere — so a comparison between two plants means something.

RESULTS

The financial case, independently measured

Forrester built a Total Economic Impact model on UpKeep customers. These are their figures, not ours.

315%

Return on investment from moving maintenance onto UpKeep

Forrester Total Economic Impact study

$638K

Savings from downtime avoided across the study period

Forrester Total Economic Impact study

90%

Reduction in technician time spent filing work orders and finding asset information

Forrester Total Economic Impact study

KEY WORKFLOWS

Where an executive actually touches the system

Not in a work order. These are the three moments that matter.

The monthly operating review

  1. Analytics Downtime, PM compliance, and cost by site, from the work rather than a submitted spreadsheet.
  2. Nova Ask why a site moved, and get the underlying work orders rather than a summary.
  3. Analytics The same definitions everywhere, so two plants are genuinely comparable.

The capital plan

  1. Capital Planning Asset condition and repair history produce a funded and unfunded view by year.
  2. Analytics Cost of keeping an asset versus replacing it, from its own record.
  3. Capital Planning A request arrives with the evidence already attached.

A risk question from the board

  1. Safety Incident rate, corrective action closure, and OSHA position by site.
  2. Learn Who is trained and signed off on what, across the whole workforce.
  3. Analytics Compliance evidence produced from records rather than assembled under deadline.

NOVA

Ask the follow-up question in the meeting

Nova is UpKeep's AI assistant, and it builds apps. Ask it in plain language and it answers from your own operational data, so the second question does not become an action item.

See how Nova works
  • Which assets cost the most to maintain relative to their replacement value?
  • Show unplanned downtime by site for the last four quarters.
  • Build a one-page operations summary for the board pack.

Questions executives ask

What return should we expect from a CMMS?

Forrester modelled 315% ROI across UpKeep customers, with $638K attributed to avoided downtime over the study period.

Treat any vendor figure, including ours, as a starting point rather than a forecast. The number that matters for you is your own downtime cost per hour multiplied by the hours you currently lose, and most organizations do not know either figure until the work is being recorded.

How do we know the data is trustworthy?

Because it is a by-product of the work rather than a report someone assembles. A downtime figure traces to the work orders behind it, and you can open them.

That is also the honest caveat: the numbers are only as good as the adoption. A rollout where technicians do not close jobs on the system produces confident nonsense.

Our ERP already has a maintenance module. Why add this?

An ERP records maintenance as cost. It is accurate about what was spent and usually vague about what was done, because the work happens in front of an asset on a phone.

UpKeep does not replace the ERP. Purchase orders, invoices, and the ledger stay where they are; the labor and parts cost flows back. Most organizations run both.

Can we compare performance across sites?

Yes, provided the definitions are shared. One system with one set of measures is what makes a comparison legitimate — and it will surface uncomfortable differences between sites in the first quarter.

How does this support a capital plan?

Condition and repair history accumulate from the work you already do, so an asset arrives at the funding conversation with its own record rather than an anecdote. Capital Planning turns that into a funded and unfunded view by year.

What does implementation actually require from us?

A clean asset list and someone accountable for adoption at each site. The software is the easy part.

Rollouts fail on change management rather than configuration, which is why phasing by site and starting with the equipment that fails most tends to work better than a simultaneous launch.

Is UpKeep secure enough for our IT review?

UpKeep is SOC 2 Type II, GDPR and CCPA aligned, with SSO available on the Enterprise plan. Security documentation and the current certification position live at trust.upkeep.com, which is the right link to hand your IT team.

GET STARTED

See it against your own numbers

Bring one site and its worst-performing assets. We will walk through the rollup, and what it would take to make it defensible.