UPKEEP PROJECTS

Run the outage where the work already lives

Shutdowns, turnarounds, installs, and capital projects planned and executed as work orders, against the same crew, parts, and assets as your daily maintenance. Not a plan in one tool and the work in another.

See what it does →
  • Scope from your deferred backlog
  • Tasks execute as work orders
  • Live budget versus actual
UpKeep Projects assignment board showing project tasks scheduled as work orders across a technician crew
McDonald's Caterpillar Pepsi Orangetheory Chevron Unilever Yamaha

Trusted by 4,000+ industrial teams

SOLUTIONS

Operations projects, not generic task tracking

A shutdown competes with routine maintenance for the same people and the same parts. Only a tool that holds both can plan it honestly.

The shutdown plan lives in a spreadsheet and the work lives somewhere else.

Project tasks are work orders. The plan and the execution are the same records, so progress is what technicians actually closed rather than what someone updated in a status column.

A turnaround task and a Thursday PM need the same millwright.

Project work and daily maintenance draw from one crew, one parts inventory, and one asset list, so the conflict shows up while it can still be resolved instead of on the day.

Building the outage work list takes weeks of asking around.

The list comes from the deferred backlog you already have. Filter by asset, area, and criticality, pull the work into the project, and the scope is built from the record rather than from memory.

Project cost is known a month after the project ends.

Labor, parts, and contractor cost roll up as the work happens, from the same work orders and purchase orders doing the job. Budget against actual is current, not retrospective.

Parts for the shutdown are ordered late and staged badly.

Kits are built against the project, reserved out of stock, and their purchase orders tracked to arrival. You find out a long-lead item is late in week two, not on the morning of the outage.

When the project closes, the asset record does not reflect what changed.

Because the work was done as work orders against assets, the history, replaced components, and updated documentation are already in place. Close-out is a review rather than a data-entry project.

FEATURES

Plan it, staff it, stage it, close it

Sized for the outages and capital work a plant or facilities team actually runs.

Project record

Scope, budget, phases, owner, site, and the assets involved. One place that answers what this project is and where it stands.

Work breakdown

Break a project into phases and tasks, where tasks become assignable work orders. The link between plan and execution is the whole point.

Timeline and dependencies

Sequence work, set dependencies, and see the critical path. Enough scheduling to run an outage, without a scheduling tool nobody updates.

Resource loading

Assign against the same technician pool maintenance draws from, with crew capacity and certifications respected.

Budget and actuals

Labor, parts, and vendor cost accruing from the work itself. Committed spend from open purchase orders included, not just what has been invoiced.

Parts staging

Build kits against the project, reserve stock so it is not consumed by daily work, and track long-lead items to arrival.

Permits and contractors

Lockout and permit-to-work on project tasks, plus contractor scopes, rate cards, and compliance documents for the outside crews on site.

Documents and change

Drawings, submittals, and specs attached where the work happens, with change orders recorded against scope and budget.

Portfolio view

Every active project across sites with status, spend, and slippage, so a director can see the whole program without asking for updates.

Frequently asked questions

How is this different from Asana, Smartsheet, or Microsoft Project?

Those are general project tools and they are good at plans. They have no idea that a task and a preventive maintenance job need the same millwright on Thursday, that a part is reserved in a storeroom, or that a task is really work on a specific asset with twenty years of repair history. UpKeep Projects is narrower on purpose: operations projects, executed as work orders, against your assets and your crew. If you are running a marketing program, use Asana.

What kind of projects is this built for?

Shutdowns, turnarounds, and outages; capital project execution; equipment installation and commissioning; multi-site rollouts; building renovations and system replacements; and PM program overhauls. The common thread is that the work is done by maintenance or facilities crews against physical assets.

Is this a construction project management tool?

No. Procore, Autodesk Construction Cloud, and their peers own new-build construction, with submittals, RFIs, and progress billing built for general contractors. UpKeep Projects is for the owner-operator side: the work your own team and your service vendors do on assets you already own and will keep maintaining afterwards.

Do we need UpKeep CMMS to use Projects?

Yes, in practice. Projects is a container that groups work orders, budget, and schedule, so the work order engine is what actually executes the project. Without it you would have a plan and no execution, which is the problem this is meant to solve.

Can we plan an outage from our maintenance backlog?

That is the main workflow. Filter deferred work by asset, area, criticality, and estimated hours, pull the selected items into the project, and you have a scoped work list with estimates attached. Most teams find this is the fastest part of planning once the backlog is in one place.

How do contractors fit in?

Contractor work is planned as project tasks and procured as service purchase orders with scopes, rate cards, and not-to-exceed limits. Compliance documents and insurance certificates sit on the vendor record. Vendors sourced through UpKeep Providers work the same way.

Does it do critical path and resource leveling?

It does dependencies and a critical path, and it shows resource conflicts against real crew capacity. It does not attempt the optimization-heavy leveling that a dedicated turnaround planning tool like Prometheus does for very large refinery outages. For a plant or facilities team running outages measured in days and weeks, it is sized right.

What does close-out look like?

Because the work ran as work orders against assets, the maintenance history, replaced components, updated meters, and attached documentation are already in place when the last task closes. Close-out is reviewing final cost against budget and confirming the asset records reflect what changed, rather than rebuilding a record after the fact.

Plan your next shutdown with us

Bring the outage you are already dreading. We will build the work list from your backlog and show you where the resource conflicts are.